From Compliance to Performance: The Real Role of TAB in Achieving Closeout
Cole Woodward, CORE Construction
Justin Lewis, TBE, CxA, Pangea Consulting Group
Cody Shook, PE, TBE, CxA, Precision Flow
Engineering
Ross Brindle, Skiles Group
Many systems meet TAB requirements yet fail to perform as intended. This panel explores the gap between compliance and performance, focusing on how late-stage TAB often reveals issues tied to coordination gaps, controls integration, installation quality, and inherent design or testing limitations. Through the perspectives of TAB professionals and general contractors, the discussion will examine how a more proactive GC–TAB partnership—built on early engagement, system readiness, and defined validation checkpoints—can reduce rework and improve closeout outcomes. Emphasis will be placed on practical best practices that position TAB as a quality assurance tool supporting commissioning and functional performance, rather than a final-stage verification step.
Learning objectives:
- Why is it better for the project to have the general contractor hold the TAB contract?
- What added value is typically overlooked in the TAB scope?
- When should TAB be brought in on a project?
- What are general contractors main pinch points when it comes to TAB?